&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Archive for May, 2008

May 31 2008

UConn’s Calhoun gets treatment for skin cancer

calhoun.jpgUniversity of Connecticut’s men’s basketball coach Jim Calhoun has been diagnosed with a second round of skin cancer.

The 66 year old Hall of Fame coach was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma when a needle biopsy of a lump in the upper right side of his neck came back positive for cancer. Squamous cell is a fairly slow growing cancer, according to Calhoun’s physician, Dr. Jeffrey Spiro. The lump and several lymph nodes were removed.

Calhoun had a squamous cell lesion removed from his cheek last summer, and doctors believe that this latest bout is related to the first. He will undergo radiation treatment beginning later in June.

In 2003, Calhoun was diagnosed with and treated for prostate cancer.

So now I’ll climb up on my soapbox.

Skin cancer is nearly 100% preventable if you take precautions. But, while most will slather on the suntan lotion when at the pool or beach, that’s about it.

When was the last time you put on the sun block when you were at a football game? How about when you go to your kid’s baseball game?

Sure, it might seem silly, but speaking as someone who has had four bouts of skin cancer, it ain’t. Give me the lotion and keep me from the knife! I wasn’t a “baker,” either. Most of my sun exposure has come through going to games and sitting in the stands. And now I get to visit the dermatologist every six months for a “full body check.” It isn’t as glamorous as it sounds, either.

Oh, and in case you think that skin cancer comes around late in life, forget that. Mine first came along in my 30’s.

So learn a lesson from Coach Calhoun, and take it from me, your humble blogger… the only thing you want to take home from the game is a sore throat from screaming, not a lifetime of doctor visits.

Advertise Here with Today.com

No responses yet

May 30 2008

O.J. Mayo saga continues

8189772_36_2.jpgO.J. Mayo, formerly of Southern Cal and currently prepping for the NBA draft, arrived in Orlando on Thursday and faced the media at a press conference held at the Grand Cypress Hyatt.

He is in Florida for the NBA’s physical and agility testing.

And, as expected, most of the questions centered on allegations by ESPN’s Outside the Lines, which claims that cash, gifts and various other extra benefits were passed on to him by Rodney Guillory, a runner for agents Calvin Andrews and Bill Duffy of Bill Duffy Associates (BDA).

Sticking to his story, Mayo continued to deny the allegations. He says he never accepted a penny, and paid for his own portion of the meal when he ate with Guillory.

“I understand the rules,” said Mayo.

When asked why Louis Johnson made the allegations, Mayo says he doesn’t know, but suspects ulterior motives.

“I understand that he’s writing a book,” Mayo went on. “I haven’t talked to Lou, Louis since January.”

Oops.

On Outside the Lines, Mayo is seen talking to both Johnson and Guillory at USC on March 7. Then the threesome gets into Guillory’s car and leave.

Mayo claims he was “overwhelmed” when he first heard of the allegations, on Mother’s Day. “As the oldest son, you don’t want to bring that on your mother on Mother’s Day. I was totally overwhelmed and didn’t understand what was going on.”

When asked if he will cooperate if contacted by the NCAA, Mayo said, “I can be as cooperative as possible.”

OK, I’m not sure what that means. “As cooperative as possible?” At what point would it be impossible to cooperate?

At any rate, Mayo is no longer represented by BDA. He says that he and his family felt like it was time to cut ties, with all the drama that is going on.

I don’t know where this torrid tale will end, but I have a sneaky suspicion that, while Mayo may be moving on to the NBA and what will probably be a lucrative career, USC will be dealing with the nasty aftermath for a few years to come.

Maybe Mayo should consider cutting a check to USC to pay for the upcoming investigation. Seems like the least the soon-to-be multi-millionaire could do.

No responses yet

May 29 2008

Trinity loses perfect season, wins D-III title

Published by emismom under College Sports Edit This

bncaawisccelebrationw08.jpg

The Trinity College baseball team won the NCAA Division III title today in dramatic fashion.

And that, friends, is putting it mildly.

The day opened with TC taking on Johns Hopkins. Hopkins, playing with one loss in the double-elimination tournament, needed to post two wins over Trinity to win the title, while Trinity needed only to win the first game.

The Bantams, sporting a perfect record of 44-0, hoped to close out a perfect year, but Hopkins had other ideas. The Blue Jays posted a 4-3 win, forcing a second game for all the marbles, and spoiling the Bantams perfect season in the process.

But Trinity College kept it’s eye on the prize. The Bantams were down, 4-3, in game two, heading into the bottom of the ninth inning. But sophomore Matt Sullivan and senior Guy Gogliettino, Jr., drew back-to-back bases loaded full count walks to give Trinity College its first ever baseball National Championship, 5-4.

That’s right, back-to-back, bases loaded, full count walks!

To top that, it was Gogliettino’s first at-bat of the Championship Tournament. He had entered the game as a defensive replacement, and left the game carried off on the shoulders of his teammates. He actually fouled off seven pitches before drawing the full count walk to win the game.

That’s called earning it the hard way.

So Trinity finished it’s storied season with a mark of 45-1 and an NCAA D-III title.

And get this little factoid: The Bantams baseball team joined the 1990 Trinity College women’s softball team as the only NCAA baseball or softball teams in any division to go undefeated in an entire regular season.

Wonder what’s in the water up in Hartford, Conn.?

No responses yet

May 28 2008

Big Ten Network: A bad idea gone worse

bigten-212w.gif

The Southeastern Conference is considering starting it’s own network, much like the Big Ten has done.

Based on the reviews of the BTN, I hope the SEC reconsiders, or at the very least learns from the mistakes of their northern sports brethren.

The Big Ten Network is a huge disappointment to fans of those teams. Why? Because so few cable companies picked up the network that most fans never get a chance to see the games.

Oddly enough, I get the Big 10 Network here in the south on my cable company. My husband, a card-carrying Big 10 fan, was thrilled when we got the channel. He gets to watch his beloved Michigan State Spartans much more often, and he also gets to catch the coaches shows in both football and basketball. But I venture to say that he is one of about 20 people in town who watch the channel, and it is rarely watched, at that. Talk about niche programing!

Then we were shocked when we visited his family in East Lansing, Mich. (home of the Spartans) and found out that not only do they not get the BTN, most of the state doesn’t!

So I looked deeper into the whole thing and found out some interesting facts:

  • The Big Ten Network is 51% owned by the Big Ten, and 49% owned by Fox.
  • Fox also owns part of DirecTV, which is the only major video provider with an agreement to carry the Big Ten Network.
  • Cable companies in the eight-state Big Ten region are being asked to pay $1.10 per customer per month. At that rate, the Big Ten Network could conceivably make $237 million each year from the Big Ten states alone! As a comparison, ESPN-U costs 10 cents per viewer per month, ESPN costs $2.49, and CSTV (College Sports TV) costs 18 cents per viewer.
  • Cable companies outside of the Big Ten region are being asked to pay 10 cents per customer, per month. (this explains why I have the network and my hubby’s family doesn’t)
  • Many of the games that the Big Ten Network carried this past season were previously carried free on broadcast television or cable networks already in place.
  • The Big Ten Network is asking to be carried as part of the standard cable package, so viewers will pay whether or not they want the channel.

(NOTE: The figures above were gathered from various sources, and may have changed… although not greatly)
Just a quick look around various fan boards online and you will quickly see that the Big Ten Network is not fan-friendly. For the most part, the fans who matter hate it.

And as much as I hate to admit it, I think this is just another brick in the wall of college sports. Money is the driving force behind so many decisions made in the AD’s offices. Stadiums that sell out every game, every year are being “remodeled” and ticket prices shoot up. I’m sorry, but if the stadium seats 90,000 to 110,000 fans, at anywhere from $35-$55 a pop seven times a year, well, you do the math! A conservative estimate would be $30 plus million at the “big dog” schools. Oh, and that isn’t taking into account parking, concessions, memorabilia, etc. (and to be fair, I’m not taking into account the outlay such as scholarships, salaries, insurance, etc.)
I realize that football funds most other sports on campuses. But this is getting way out of hand… out of the fans hands.

What happens when a stadium is renovated? They take out 10 or 20 thousand seats and put in “luxury boxes” that seat a lot less, but cost a lot more. You ever look in those boxes at games? Heck, most the time the folks aren’t even watching.

And what happened with the Big Ten Network deal. More money, less availability to the average fan.

So folks, we were being priced out of the stadiums, and now we are being priced out of even watching the games at home.

Being a fan just costs too much!

No responses yet

May 27 2008

Is cheerleading a sport?

Published by emismom under College Sports Edit This

206475_megaphones.jpgOK, here it comes… the blog that will totally tick off all of my cheerleader friends.

I was a college cheerleading coach for several years. I even coached a coed squad that competed at nationals. My squad practiced long hours, weathered numerous injuries. They worked hard on skills, such as partner stunts, tumbling, dance, etc. They had required time in the weight room.

But no, I don’t think cheerleading is a sport.

Let the hate bombs fly!

Here is what I do think. I think cheerleaders, especially those at the highest level, are athletes. They work as hard as the student-athletes you see competing in traditional sports on TV. And they risk serious injury… and even death (there have been several deaths attributed to cheerleading over the years).

If you look at the definition of sport, it says “An athletic activity requiring skill or physical prowess and often of a competitive nature, as racing, baseball, tennis, golf, bowling, wrestling, boxing, hunting, fishing, etc.” (courtesy Dictionary.com)

The key word in the definition is “competitive.” Cheerleading, in its true form, was never intended to be competitive. It was developed to be a support to the teams competing on the field. The students were yell leaders, charged with getting the crowd to cheer for the home team, to organize the spirit sections to create a home field advantage.

But it was never intended to be a sport in and of itself.

Competition cheerleading, which is now big business, came later. It is a once a year thing for most universities, taking place outside of the normal course of the university. The intent of the squad remains the same, to support the athletic teams, and to entertain and lead the fans.

Yes, there are squads that are competition only. But I can make the argument that these aren’t really cheerleading squads anyway. When do they cheer? Whom do they lead? They are really organized acrobatic teams, not cheerleaders.

Most cheerleaders, if not all, disagree with me. I don’t mean to belittle them. I believe that cheerleaders deserve scholarship money. Much is expected of them time-wise and ability-wise at the college level. When I was a mascot, we were presented with honorary letters at the end of the season. We earned them.

But cheerleading as sport? I just don’t think so.

3 responses so far

May 26 2008

Mascots… loveable creatures or annoying interruptions?

Published by emismom under College Sports Edit This

the-hawk-300.jpg

Are you a mascot fan or not?

Mascots have been around in one form or another since the beginning of sports teams. But they really took off in the late 60’s, and there has been no turning back.fighting_artie2.gif

Mascots have developed into the focus of marketing campaigns, the “brand identity” of universities. T-shirts, bumper stickers, web sites. It all adds up to some serious money.
At some schools, the “human” version grew out of a live version. Georgia’s Uga (canine version) has been joined by Hairy Dawg (costumed version), or Smokey at Tennessee (both canine and costumed versions).

ucsantacruzsluglogo.gifMascots range from the sublime The Hawk (St. Joseph’s mascot who stands at the end of the bend and never stops “flapping” its wings, even at halftime) to the ridiculous (Artie the Fighting Artichoke of Scottsdale Community College or Sammy the Slug, the banana slug mascot of California Santa Cruz).

Mascots have a history of getting into some trouble, too. Pretty entertaining trouble.

Take, for instance, the Stanford Cardinal “Tree.” Forget for a minute that it looks kind of ridiculous to have a tree running around the sideline. But on Feb. 9, 2006, the Tree was disciplined for drinking during the 65-62 loss on the road at Cal. He registered a .157 blood alcohol level. Oh, and don’t forget that the Tree was banned from ESPN.com’s Battle of the Mascots in 1997, for hacking into the voting database and fixing the results!

That is one creative tree!

Mascots have gotten ejected from games for poor sportsmanship, for stair surfing, and for harassing other teams. And on several occasions, mascots got into fistfights with each other, making for some entertaining youtube video.

But what is it like to wear the fur? To be right there on the sidelines? Let’s go to an informed opinion…

Mine.

Yes, my dirty little, well-guarded secret. I was a mascot at a major university. Big football weekends, bowl games, NCAA tournaments. Fun stuff… sort of. You think it is hot sitting in the stands when it is 90 degrees out? Try being on the field with no breeze in a costume that weighs 10-20 pounds… or more. Being thrown in the air by some ambitious cheerleaders… or taken out by some angry football players. Having a basketball thrown into your gut because you are wearing the wrong colors. Or being kidnapped!

That’s right, I was kidnapped at my very first football game. Taken into the middle of the opponent’s fans and thrown up in the air repeatedly. My tail was ripped off, I lost a “paw,” but honestly… it was fun (once it was over!).

Why did I do it? I wanted to go to the games, didn’t want to have to camp out for tickets or pay for hotel rooms. In short, I was a big fan and wanted to take it to the next level… for free (hey, I was a college student, money was always an issue!).

And here is some info I bet you didn’t know. A lot of college mascots get scholarship money, ranging from books being paid to full rides. And a fairly good percentage of these college mascots turn it into a career. Yes, mascots in the pros started out on the collegiate level. Sort of a PMA career (Professional Mascots Association).

So whether you love ‘em or hate ‘em, there aren’t going anywhere. And unless you have to run to a distant corner of the arena with a screaming four year old, you might as well sit back and enjoy the show.

For a comprehensive list of U.S. college mascots: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._college_mascots

For Scout.com’s list of top 25 mascots:
http://cfn.scout.com/2/588904.html

For more on St. Joseph’s amazing Hawk mascot (my personal favorite — and no, I wasn’t the Hawk!)
http://sjuhawks.cstv.com/school-bio/stjs-the-hawk.html

No responses yet

May 24 2008

NCAA and Ticketmaster targets of fan lawsuit

Published by emismom under College Sports Edit This

493827_tickets_1.jpg The NCAA and Ticketmaster are being sued in both California and Indiana as part of a class action lawsuit that claims the two organizations are violating racketeering laws when they force purchasers to pay a non-refundable fee to take part in a lottery for the right to purchase tickets to high-profile sports events.

Ticketmaster, based in California, and the NCAA, based in Indiana, are located in states where lotteries are illegal unless run by the state or for charitable purposes.

According to the lawsuit, fans who want to purchase tickets to the NCAA tournament must pre-pay the ticket price for the games, along with a $10 service fee. If the purchaser wins the tickets, the NCAA releases the seats, but if the purchaser doesn’t win, then they are refunded the price of the tickets, but not the $10 fee.

People can apply for Final Four tickets up to 10 times, but can only win once. The NCAA charges a $6 handling fee for each entry, along with full payment. Applicants can only win once, so if one enters 10 times and wins once, they still are not refunded the fee from the other nine entries.

The lawsuit goes on to say that the NCAA and Ticketmaster have held the money for as long as five months before refunding the losing lottery bids.

Most recently, the NCAA received an estimated 100,000 entries for the Final Four in San Antonio, but only distributed 4,600 tickets.

Wow, that’s a mouthful!

I’m not sure how I come down on this one. OK, on the part about not refunding the money right away, big time wrong. I guess the bigwigs are pocketing the interest for a few months before sending out the refunds, but that is wrong, wrong, wrong. That’s a lot of gas money!

But it seems like a handling fee would be necessary. Even if you don’t win, the applications have to be processed. These things don’t run themselves, do they? Salaries have to be paid, electricity to run computers, etc.

So I think this may be a whole lot of junk about nothing… But be sure that the cost of defending the lawsuit will be added to your ticket prices in the near future!

No responses yet

May 23 2008

JoePa takes on the BCS

images-3.jpegJoe Paterno is ticked off. The 81 year old Penn State coach calls the reasons given for not moving into a playoff system for Division I-A bogus (oops, excuse me, I mean the Football Bowl Subdivision).

JoePa has a point. Get the reasons given by the conferences that are against a playoff (including PSU’s Big 10):

  • The “sanctity” of the regular season
  • Players would be forced to miss too much class
  • Season could extend into a second semester.

OK, “sanctity” is a pretty strong word. I love football as much as the next guy, but I’m not sure I would call the college football regular season “holy,” “saintly,” or “godly.” (definitions courtesy of dictionary.com)

As for the rest of the argument, Joey P. points out what all of us can see (all of us except the powers that be of the Big 10, Pac 10, Big 12, Big East, et. al. — the only conferences that support the move are the SEC and ACC).

Missing classes? Hey, check out hoops teams and how much school those guys miss… mid-week games starting in November, going through March. Hey, that takes out another argument, about extending into a second semester.

Face it, football players miss less class than most sports because they compete only on weekends (with the exception of ESPN big $$$ games on other nights… ah, the power of the dollar… wonder why the NCAA doesn’t jump on that one!).

The truth is, the powers that be in college football don’t want to tick off the powers that be in the bowls; in other words, the money guys. Tickets sold to bowl games don’t pay the rent, the sponsorships do, the television rights do. And if that were to be watered down, if the “WeHaveAlotOfMoneyToThrowAround.com Bowl” matchup between the Anteaters of Michigan Technological State University of Agriculture-Germfask Campus vs. the California State Liberal Arts College of Music and Dance Tip-Toers, well, sponsors would fall like rain in April.

Only that wouldn’t happen. You know it and I know it. So what are they afraid of. Frankly, who cares if the Rose Bowl features a Big 10 and Pac 10 matchup each year? If they are so blooming into tradition, they shouldn’t allow the newbies in each conference to compete; go with the leagues as they were in the good old days (you know, Pac 8 vs. Big 10… before it was really the Big 11).

Face it, tradition is only important to these guys if it helps them win their point. If they wanted a playoff system, we would be hearing about how we have to modernize, change with the times. New is good, Old is bad.

Oh, and get this little gem that I had never heard of, but Paterno has brought to light. The Coaches Poll isn’t so much a poll as a forced vote. Coaches are required to vote for the team that wins the BCS title game. Paterno has not voted since 2004, when he wanted to vote for undefeated Auburn, but was not allowed to. He was told to vote for USC, or he couldn’t participate… so he chose the latter.

What’s the point of taking a poll if you are telling the voters how to vote?

Duh.

So the old guy at Penn State has it right. Too bad money talks louder than common sense.

No responses yet

May 22 2008

Sportwriter crossed the line in feud with Tennessee football coach

Published by emismom under College Sports Edit This

a-fulmer1639-250.jpgI have had quite a few comments since my last column. Seems everyone has read columns by sportwriters that seem to have little to do with sports, and more to do with, well,

One in particular caught my eye. Several wrote and told me about a sports editor who seems to have crossed the line in his reporting. John Adams, sports editor with the Knoxville News-Sentinel in Knoxville, Tenn., appears to have made it his mission to get Tennessee head coach Phillip Fulmer fired.

Now, if Fulmer had posted years of mediocrity, I would probably understand. Heck, UT had a losing season a couple of years back, and that is probably enough to get the fan base screaming for a change. But overall, Fulmer has done a pretty respectable job of keeping UT in the rankings, and keeping them off of (major) probation.

Not good enough for Adams, evidently.

It came to a head back in February, when a Tennessee player was arrested for DUI, and Fulmer suspended the player for five games. Not harsh enough, according to Adams. A program out of control, he continued.

So in the Feb. 19 issue of the KNS, Adams called for Fulmer to be fired. The article talks about a program out of control, mired in mediocrity. He goes on to cite many instances of UT players running afoul of the law.

But Adams drops the ball on this issue. Several of his examples are of former UT athletes who ran afoul of the law after graduation. I was not aware that a coach was supposed to police his players even after they had left school!

And while UT has definitely had its share of problems with the law, it would be difficult to name many schools who hadn’t. It is an issue that needs to be addressed, but it is definitely not just a Tennessee issue, or even an SEC issue.

Following the article, Adams went on a “tour” of radio stations of the southeast, berating Fulmer far and wide. The worst was probably his appearance on the the Paul Finebaum radio show in Birmingham, Ala. Not exactly Tennessee-friendly country anyway. The two ripped into Fulmer like junkyard dogs fighting over a bone. Frankly, it sounded personal, although I’m not sure what the Coach did to tick these two off.

I guess that Adams thinks he is witty and in demand because of his brilliant writing, but I’m pretty sure that anyone who would be willing to hang an SEC coach out to dry would be popular… on the opponents’ radio stations.

Now, lest you start thinking that I am alone in my belief that this man overstepped the bounds of his job, others have taken issue with Adams calling for Fulmer’s job.

David Climer, columnist for the Tennessean newspaper in Nashville, had this to write:

“Certainly, I’ve been critical of Fulmer in the past. It’s safe to say we’ve agreed to disagree on a number of matters. But you have to draw the line somewhere. We can be critics, but we should be fair.”

Gee, a reasonable voice, one of Adams’ peers. Perhaps he should listen.

Whenever I hear a fan berate a player, or read an article that tears apart a coach, I wonder how the fan or writer would feel if it was their life being dissected in the media. Sure, coaches and athletes know what they are getting into, but Climer is right. There has to be a line somewhere.

Coach Fulmer did something many did not expect… he responded. Not out of anger (although I’m sure he was ticked off), but with intelligence and humility… two qualities that may be lacking in Mr. Adams writing.

The text of Coach Fulmers’ reply:

Most college football fans visualize the head coach pacing the sidelines on Saturday afternoon. But the truth is that our hardest work is done far from the view of fans, sportswriters, or television cameras.

In my 30 years of coaching, my proudest victories have come in places much quieter than Neyland Stadium - they’ve come when departing seniors stop by my office the day before graduating or when mothers send notes of thanks, acknowledging that the immature boys they sent to Knoxville have come home as responsible young men.

Those are the moments that are the greatest moments in coaching and the importance compels me to do something I have never done in my career - respond directly in writing to a negative column in the newspaper.

In Tuesday’s Knoxville News-Sentinel, you may have seen John Adams’ column attacking my character and my leadership. We live in a free country, and Mr. Adams has built a successful career speaking his mind - that’s his right. But the readers of the News-Sentinel have a right to know what Mr. Adams doesn’t know, as well.

Mr. Adams has never sat next to me in a prospect’s living room, looking his mother or grandmother in the eyes and promising to treat the young man like he was my own child - giving him tough love when necessary and an opportunity to straighten up when that’s in order. It is a promise I take seriously and will never abandon to please any columnist.

My first job as a coach is to be an educator and a mentor. That’s why I have dedicated my professional life to football on the college level and my private life to charities like the Jason Foundation that prevents teen suicide, and the Boys and Girls Club that touches the lives of today’s youth at a very early age.

At the flagship university in my home state, I am expected to run a program that succeeds on the field - but I am also obligated and committed to doing my best to help every player become an educated, responsible adult. We don’t win every game and we don’t succeed in grooming every young man, but make no mistake that my first and foremost priority is the growth of our young men as well as winning football games.

Unfortunately there is no template for helping young people grow to be well-adjusted, responsible adults. I have four children of my own, including a varsity athlete, and like any parent can tell you, each child is unique and each one requires different parenting. The same is true of our football players. The vast majority of our players come to UT and have a great experience, enriching our campus community, and leaving it better than they found it. They all have needs along the way - in the case of a very small number of them, they need a good dose of discipline and accountability.

Since I have been the head coach at UT, I have learned a great deal about mixing “tough love” and encouragement. The hundreds of players we have graduated will gladly attest to both - they have all loved and despised me at different points in their college days. I have kicked some of our most talented athletes off the team when I thought it would do them the most good as individuals or they were damaging our goals as a team. I have taken the heat from partially-informed pundits when I gave others a second chance. I accept that role with honor and humility; it’s what an educator does.

It is on this point that I feel most compelled to take issue with Mr. Adams’ column. He is certainly free to criticize my football strategy - during my tenure our program has won more games than 95 percent of all other major college programs, but his criticism on that is fair game. He is free to critique our team’s appeal with our fans - we have ranked no worse than fourth in attendance in the nation every year I have been head coach, but he’s within his rights to chastise us for that too. He is free to say that my best days are behind me - our most recent team finished first in what was the toughest SEC East in two decades, but I accept his criticism on that as well. What I will not accept is Mr. Adams questioning my integrity, my sense of fairness, or values as a man.

At no time in my tenure has a player’s football skill or athletic success been a factor in the way he was disciplined. Never. Our internal discipline is based on one factor alone: the course that is most likely to help that individual young man make amends and get his life straight. We make these decisions after much deliberation and with the input of administration, professional staff, counselors, and when necessary, law enforcement. This is not the easy way to mete out punishment. It requires judgment and leadership to keep the entire team focused and respectful of rules and basic morality, but it is the method that best serves the interest of our young men. In my 15 years, I’ve undoubtedly made some mistakes, but I try to do what I think is in the best interest for each young man.

It should be noted this is not the first time Mr. Adams has raised this complaint with limited perspective. Thirteen years ago I suspended a young man for two games based on a troubling off-the-field incident and Mr. Adams wrote that I should have kicked him off the team instead. I knew that young man better than Mr. Adams did, and today he is not only a UT graduate, but a sergeant with the Knoxville Sheriff’s Department, putting his life on the line for all of us everyday.

Our program, like almost any student group at any major university, has had more students find trouble than any of us in collegiate administration desire. As a parent myself, I routinely lose sleep worrying about the 100 or so young men put in my care. And like any educator, I want all our students to succeed all the time. I’m sure Mr. Adams wants that, too. But from inside the university halls looking outward, that job is a lot different than it looks from the press box where Mr. Adams sits.

Mr. Adams, you have been served.

No responses yet

May 21 2008

LA Times Sportswriter hammers opposing fans

1195427674416185435johnny_automatic_open_mouthsvgthumb.png

When I was a kid, I couldn’t wait for the newspapers to come. We had both a morning and and an evening paper, and each had great sports sections and top-notch sports writers. I loved to read the stories, and I felt like through each one I learned something, either about a sport or an athlete.

And the game recaps! If I hadn’t seen the game, by the time I finished the article I felt like I had. I could almost taste the hot dogs and smell the popcorn!

Is it any wonder I became a sportswriter?

But things are different now. And that brings me to an article written back on March 28 by T.J. Simers of the Los Angeles Times.

Simers was covering UCLA in the NCAA Tournament. The Bruins faced Western Kentucky University in the Sweet 16. The Hilltoppers had the proverbial “unlikely run” in the tournament. WKU, the 12th seed, defeated #5 seed Drake, 101-99, on a last second three-pointer in overtime. They followed that up with a win over #13 seed San Diego, 72-63.

WKU gave UCLA a game, and although the Bruins led at the half by 21, WKU rallied to cut the lead to four before losing 88-78. The Hilltoppers finished the year with a record of 29-7.

Evidently, though, Simers didn’t believe that Western should have been in the gym. He derided the fans and the University over and over in a column that can be, at best, described as the rantings of the uninformed. At worst, it is just poor sportswriting.

The point of his article was that UCLA was being given a relatively free pass into the Final Four. OK, everybody has opinions on the brackets, and Simers gets a paycheck to express his.

But someone please explain to me what calling the Hilltoppers the “Hillboppers” has to do with game coverage?

He goes on to say that Western has a “pregnant Elmo” for a mascot. If Mr. Simers had done any research, he might have learned that “Big Red,” as the Western mascot is called, has been featured many times in ESPN commercials, and has been rated one of the nation’s favorite mascots by popular voting. May not mean much to Mr. Simers, but not bad for a “pregnant Elmo.”

He goes on to say, “… while I realize there’s probably not much to do in Western Kentucky, must they advertise it?” He derides the fans for wearing red and cheering for the “Big Red,” saying that WKU fans are Nebraska wannabes.

Uh, don’t most fans wear school colors and cheer for the “Big (insert color here)?” Oh, and here is a bit of irony. Dr. Martin Massengale, WKU 1952, served as president of The University of Nebraska from 1989-1994.

Simers takes a swipe at WKU alumni, saying that the two most famous celebrities to attend Western are Michael Rosenbaum (Lex Luther on the TV show Smallville) and Nappy Roots (southern rappers). Simers claims he did research on this point, too.

It took me about two minutes to find that the list of famous alums from WKU is long and prestigious. How about Romeo Crennel (’69, ‘77), coach of the Cleveland Browns? PGA golfer Kenny Perry (82)? Duncan Hines, baking wizard? There’s even a sportswriter on the list (Thomas George, ‘82, sportswriter for the New York Times).

If Mr. Simers needs a Hollywood connection to validate, you can’t do much better than Academy Award winning director John Carpenter (’68), who directed “Halloween,” “The Fog,” and numerous other successful movies.

for more, visit http://www.wku.edu/textonly/notables.html

Oh, and the next time Mr. Simers sees a Corvette screaming down the California interstate, he should know that all Corvettes… ALL! are built in Bowling Green.

When I read Mr. Simers column, it really ticked me off. Yeah, he gets to express an opinion… but most of his readers probably assume it is an informed opinion. What makes me mad is the thought that there are many in Los Angeles whose sole opinion of Western Kentucky University and Bowling Green is derived from his column.

Before you think I am a WKU alum or fan, you are wrong on both points. I am the product of a proverbial BCS school. My team went deep in the NCAA hoops tourney. My football team stays in the top 10 year in and year out.

But I respect other universities and their programs. All fans love their schools, wear the colors, and, frankly, finance the athletic endeavors by purchasing tickets. We all have a common bond, a love of college athletics. And, in my travels around this country attending college sports events, I have loved getting to meet the fans and see the traditions, at schools both large and small.

Mr. Simers, size really doesn’t matter… but perhaps integrity does.

One response so far

Next »

Advertise Here